In the appeal now lies before the written decision of the Regional Court of Braunschweig . On the oral verdict, we have reported here .
is in the written reasoning of the Court, inter alia, mutatis mutandis:
The two illustrations, the defender of the accused had claimed angry face each - contrary to the prosecutor - against the decisive point incompatible.
The defender is not obliged to choose the considerate the possible interpretation that affects the investigating officers at least. He was allowed to choose the variant that uses his client the most.
The outspoken warning with punishment reserved covered then finally only one relatively unimportant minor point.
In support of the sentence the Court of Appeals also held fixed yet, that the defender had been followed in this process in excess.
Furthermore, a defender against his client was just committed to its favor with all the forces, such evidence to attack the judiciary are not collected shaped and irregular process. This applies even if the defender was aware of the guilt of the client.
Big words, which essentially agree with the four defense lawyers. Can not be accepted, however, that the court the defense is still accused (and convicted him and why has warned) that he had the nachgeredet a police officer intentionally bad. Other hand, then turns to the revision of the accused defense counsel.
0 comments:
Post a Comment